An Easy Way to Learn to Sound like a Psychic

A good way to learn and practice your cold reading skills is to watch online videos of mentalists, eyes-opened and eyes-closed psychics.

Another excellent way to learn is through online radio. There are plenty of online and offline (with websites) radio stations that offer psychic readings and advice.

What you want are the ones with call-ins where audience members ring up the station asking for advice. Unfortunately, these are often people in distress hoping to get advice from a real live psychic. If these type of readings get you angry, you might want to give this suggestion a miss.

You can go to any search engine and type in "online psychic radio" and see what's on offer. Here are a few I've listened to:

http://www.psychiconair.com
http://radiotime.com/genre/c_293/Psychic.aspx
http://radiotime.com/station/s_77481/Psychic_Radio_995.aspx
http://www.hayhouseradio.com

There are plenty of others.

(Special thanks to Roland Blade for sending me this. His web site is http://coldreadingtechniques.blogspot.com)

Psychic cold reading

From Mind Control Wiki

Want to be a hit at the next party? Perform a cold reading, and you can amaze - maybe even frighten - people with your psychic abilities. Don't worry though; no actual psychic ability is required. Cold reading is a classic trick used by magicians, soothsayers, TV psychics, and other entertainers and charlatans. By asking a person the right questions, listening carefully, and making a guess or two, you can convince even many skeptics that you really are able to communicate with the spirit world.

1. Choose a subject. The "subject" is the person on whom you will perform the cold reading.

* Sometimes cold readers will choose a subject well in advance based on information they know about that person but which that pers on does not know they know. Select the person you will "cold read" ahead of time if possible. The more time you have to learn about your subject, the better. Some cold readers actually have accomplices visit or interview the subject prior to the cold reading so that the cold reader can then use this information to dazzle the subject and the audience.

* Asking for a volunteer is also a good way to choose someone, as volunteers are likely to be receptive and, more importantly, will likely want to believe that you can communicate with the dead or that you can see things about the m that you should have no way of knowing. However, watch out for skeptics (see Warnings below).

* "Shotgun" the audience. Shotgunning is a technique in which you make one or more broad general statement, such as "I'm sensing someone who has had some marital problems recently," or "There's someone named, I think, Billy, that's asking to communicate with his granddaughter." As you address these statements to the audience, watch for reactions. There's almost certainly someone who has recently had marital problems or whose grandfather went by the name Billy. You, of course, don't yet know who, but people's reactions - especially their body language - will give them away. You can try to refine your "knowledge" by then making more specific assertions, such as, "This Billy, he lived a long life. He used to enjoy fishing, no hunting maybe - being in the outdoors." Focus on the people who reacted to your very broad first statement, and then look for further reactions. When you're pretty sure you've hit the mark with someone, call them up (if they haven't already run up to you jumping and screaming, "It's me!"). Using this technique allows you to gain the subject's confidence and to amaze the audience before the reading has even begun.

2. Observe your subject. Even if you have only a little time to get to know your subject, you can still learn a lot by "profiling" your subject .

* Look at readily available visual clues about the person that will tell you something about them. Their age, the way they dress, whether they have any deformities or unusual features, their height and weight, the presence or absence of a wedding ring - there are a multitude of clues that can help you immediately learn more about the person.

* Read the subject's body language. Before the reading starts and throughout your cold reading, watch the subject's body language carefully. Involuntary gestures, facial expressions, and changes in posture can tell you whether the person is becoming anxious, which is usually a good sign that you have said something that is correct or are about to do so. Looks of disappointment can signal that you've said something wrong, and if you correct yourself slyly and quickly, the person and the audience (if there is an audience present) will be amazed at your correction. Learn as much as you can about body language, but most importantly, just pay attention.

3. Make a mental list of assumptions about the person. As you observe the subject, think about certain things that you could reasonably guess about them. You don't actually want to make too many guesses, but it helps to sort of build a character in your mind. Some of your assumptions will be wrong, but you'll get aro und this little problem.

4. Prepare the subject. When you meet the pers on, look in their eyes and tell them, if you ha ven't already, that you can communicate with the spirit world. Introduce yourself and get the subject's name. Try to make them comfortable talking to you, but at the same time try to make them a little nervous about what is to come. Explain that the person on the "other side" really wants to communicate with them, but that you are merely a vessel or a go-between, and you will need the subject's help. This makes the reading more dramatic, prepares the subject for the possibility of mistakes, and enlists their cooperation. Be modest about your abilities, but display a quiet confidence.

5. Go fishing. If you're a professional, you may hav e studied statistical information about people, you may be trained to read body language, you may even have accomplices that help you, but let's face it: you still know hardly anything about the person sitting in front of you. If you just start making guesses, you'll almost certainly be wrong, but if you ask questions, you'll get the right answers from the subject himself. For example, you could clarify what you learned in shotgunning by asking, "Now, Billy, he's your grandfather?" Ask questions in such a way so that they can be perceived as statements. That way, if the subject affirms your question, it will seem as though you knew the answer. If the subject indicates that Billy was not his or her grandfather, however, it's okay--you were j ust asking a question.

6. Build on the answers to your questions. Most of the time, the subject will volunteer more information than is necessary. He might say something like, "No, Billy was my uncle. He lived on a farm." You now actually know something about your subject, which is more than you could say before. By using this information to ask more questions you can give the impression that you actually know quite a bit about the subject. This, obviously, requires fast thinking, but if you're a good listener - the most important quality for cold readers - you'll get up to speed quickly.

7. Use Barnum statements. Barnum statements, named after the circus showman P.T. Barnum, are statements that will apply to just about anybody but which will give the impression that you know something about the subject. Using Barnum statements is like shotgunning except you're just dealing with one person. For example, you could say, "You're on the verge of making a big decision in your life." Most people, at any given time, are dealing with a big decision, or at least one that seems big at the time. Still the subject will likely be somewhat impressed that you knew that about them, and they may even volunteer more information.

8. Make the subject's answers your own. Much of what a cold reader does is simply repeating back what the subject has said. Do this in such a way so that it appears you already knew the answer. If you manage to do this cleverly, the subject will tend to forget that it was he or she that gave you the information. Suppose the subject affirms that they are on the verge of making a big decision. You can simply say, "Yes, that's right," thereby claiming their answer as your own. You can even go further, by saying, "Yes, that's right. It's been troubling you for a while now." The more information the subject volunteers, the more information you can claim.

9. Delve deeper. Once you're on a fruitful line of questioning (or "reading"), keep going. So the subject is making a decision. You could follow that with another Barnum statement, such as, "But this decision involves another person, too." Most decisions do involve at least one other person to some extent or another. If you're observant and brave, you might notice the subject's wedding ring and say instead, "But this decision needs to be made with your husband." If you're right - because the statement is so obvious yet also targeted toward an observable attribute of the person, you probably are right - you'll be that much more impressive.

10. Use pregnant pauses. One method of fishing around for information is to pause long enough for a reaction from your subject. If, for example, you mention that the decision needs to be made with her husband, you can wait a moment to see if the person has anything to say about that. He or she may immediately tell you you're right or wrong, or they may be expecting you to tell them more. In the latter case, watch their physical reaction. If you see some reaction that tells you you're on the right track, take up where you left off: "He's worried about the decision," for example.

11. Cover your errors. Since you are in fact just asking questions and repeating information back in a different way, you shouldn't really make mistakes as you would if you were guessing things. That said, sometimes a question will simply be off the mark, and this can ruin the illusion if you don't recover quickly and gracefully. Suppose, for example, that the person says they are not on the verge of making a big decision. There are myriad ways to handle this. One would be to say that poor, dead Uncle Bill (if you're communicating with the spirit world) must be talking about someone else that you both know, a relative perhaps. Another would be to change the time frame, to ask, "But you made a big decision in the past year, something of a new start." Still another way would be to subtly change the way the question is framed: "I'm sensing something new is happening in your life or is about to happen." You don't abandon the original line of questioning. Rather you twist it just a bit until it makes sense to the subject. After all, if they then admit that something new is happening in their life, they must feel a little foolish for not recognizing the psychic message you were getting about the decision.

12. Make a positive analysis of the situation. Once you've helped the subject to open up and you have some idea of what you're talking about (or at least the subject believes you know what you're talking about), you can bring the reading to a satisfying end by relaying a message from the deceased friend or relative, or by simply giving some prognostication based on your ability to see the future. You don't need to be exact, and you don't need to give advice. Just tell the subject what he or she wants to hear: that everything will go well. You could say, for example, "Billy wants you to know that he's always watching over you, and he misses you. He's happy, and he wants you to be happy, too. And you will be. You're going to make the right decision." You may, of course, want to warn of challenges ahead to give a more realistic tinge to your reading, but when all is said and done you want the person to feel good.

* Keep the encounter brief and mysterious. If you know you will encounter the person again soon, develop other points based on future visual and response cues.

* Props, such as a Tarot deck or tea leaves, can heighten the drama and take some of the attention off the actual process of cold reading. Props can help the subject suspend their disbelief.

* You will be convincing as long as you make it seem like you know more than you do. Remember, the subject likely wants to believe in your "powers," and you just have to foster that belief. He or she will then attribute more knowledge to you than you actually displayed.

* Practice your showmanship. Learn some buzzwords. Learn how to be a convincing actor. Set the mood.

* Employees with name tags often forget that they have them on. A simple cold read is to guess the person's name. Most of the time, the person's mother will have been the primary name-giver. You can mention this, and it may reinforce their belief you have special powers.

* The "rainbow ruse" is similar to Barnum statements. In a rainbow ruse, you make a general statement about a personality trait that the subject has, but you also hedge your bets (and invite the subject to open up) by also attributing the opposite trait to them. For example, you might say, "You like to make decisions carefully and patiently, but sometimes you're impulsive."


* Be very careful whom you choose to use this technique on. There are people, for whatever reason, who will not respond well when you reveal this is just a trick (and you must always reveal it as a trick, do not lead people on to believing a cold reading was a real one) - If you pick the wrong mark, they may respond with anger or hurt. Be prepared to lose friends and respect by trying this on the wrong person! Messing with people's emotions in any way is cruel, and there will be consequences.

* Some skeptics will volunteer just to make a spectacle of debunking the cold reading myth. If you hear someone talking proudly about his or her skepticism, or if a potential subject seems too haughty, choose someone else.

* This should be used just for fun. As good as you get at this, it is simply a gimmick.

* Be aware of the effects you may have on someone. A cold reading can be beneficial because it encourages the subject to think about certain situations that may be troubling him or her. Talking about these troubles may clarify things in the subject's mind and help the person find his or her own solution. Be very careful about giving advice, predicting bad news, or opening up emotional wounds. After the reading, let the subject know that it was just for entertainment and that you don't really have any special powers.

* There are many unscrupulous cold readers and "psychics." While many just want to scam a little money, some are more dangerous. Cult leaders and criminals, for example, have been known to use these techniques to dazzle their victims.

* randi.org Examples of exchanges between celebrity cold readers and subjects
* DenisDutton.com A good discussion of the Barnum effect
* skeptics.com.au - The skeptic perspective on cold reading



Mind Control Wiki

Too many bars in rural America linked to high suicide rates instead of idyllic life

http://www.physorg.com/news172513898.html

There is a strong relationship between drinking and taking one's own life. In any given year, people with alcohol dependence (AD) commit more than 20 percent of suicides in the general population; some 80 to 90 percent of AD suicides are by men, mostly white. A new look at suicide and alcohol has found that both attempted and completed suicides occur at greater rates in rural communities with greater bar densities.

Results will be published in the December issue of Alcoholism: Clinical & Experimental Research and are currently available at Early View.

"Our study is unique in that it is spatial, longitudinal, and examines the relationship between suicide and features of the environment such as alcohol outlets, particularly bars, that might not at first glance appear related to suicide," explained Fred W. Johnson, associate research scientist at the Prevention Research Center and corresponding author for the study. "The question we sought to answer was: 'Is increased alcohol-outlet density associated with increased rates of completed suicide and of suicide attempts?'"

Johnson and his colleagues examined data - including population characteristics such as age, and place characteristics such as number of alcohol outlets - from 581 zip-code areas in California from 1995 to 2000. They also obtained numbers of hospitalizations for injuries caused by suicide attempts.

"When using aggregate data in a study like ours, one must take great care interpreting the results," cautioned Johnson. "Because it is difficult or perhaps impossible to obtain data from patrons who first drink at a bar and later take their own lives, the best one can do is refer to the results of aggregate studies like this one. Although one cannot make the strong statement that more bars cause more suicides, our findings are at least consistent with what we would expect if patronizing bars or other alcohol outlets were in fact causally related to suicide."

The results showed that completed suicides were more common in less populous zip-code areas, such as rural communities, and in zip-code areas with larger proportions of older, lower-income whites, but less common in zip code areas with larger proportions of blacks and Hispanics. Suicide attempts were also more common in rural zip codes, but those who attempted suicide were younger, and included blacks and Hispanics as well as whites.

"This suggests that the suicide rate is higher in rural areas," said Johnson. "The absolute count of suicides may be higher in urban areas because of their much greater population compared to rural areas, but the rate of suicides, the number of suicides per population, is greater in rural areas."

These results could be due to some contextual effect that affects both drinkers and non-drinkers, commented Dennis M. Gorman, interim director of the Health Science Center at Texas A&M University.

"For example, rural places with lots of bars might be depressing places to live in due to isolation, lack of social ties, etc.," said Gorman. "This 'depressing' context would affect all who live there, both drinkers and non-drinkers. The authors seem to suggest such a contextual protective effect when explaining the negative correlation between restaurants and suicides; that [restaurants] are located in areas in which suicides typically do not occur. In this case, it is not the restaurant per se that has a protective effect, but the context or area in which these are located that matters."

Johnson agreed. "Other factors include population loss as youth desert rural towns to find jobs and opportunity in urban areas," he said. "The average age of farmers is now rising toward 60, an age when suicide rates increase as medical problems multiply and social isolation increases. Some small towns cannot attract industry and jobs with tax and other incentives, meanwhile property values plummet. More frequent possession of firearms in rural areas is a major factor in rural suicides, with 75 percent of rural completed suicides nationally and 57 percent of rural completed suicides in California involving firearms."

Both Johnson and Gorman said these findings highlight a growing problem in rural American.

"Most alcohol problems are not caused by the alcohol dependent, but by ordinary people who drink too much on a given occasion, leading to motor vehicle, pedestrian, and bicycle accidents," said Johnson. "All of these problems are related to alcohol outlets, as are more sinister problems such as homicide, assault, domestic violence, child abuse, and child neglect. This study suggests that suicide may be one of the more severe problems related to alcohol outlets, and further suggests that one way to reduce suicides and other problems related to alcohol outlets is to reduce the number of outlets, particularly bars."

"One might also advise against moving into areas that have a high density of bars and off-premise alcohol outlets," said Gorman. "There are a number of social problems that seem to cluster in places with high alcohol-outlet density, excluding restaurants, whether this is as a result of alcohol consumption or a result of problem-prone individuals being attracted into such areas."

"It is unfortunate that the rural-suicide problem, along with other rural problems, are unlikely to get the attention they deserve because ours is such a predominantly urban society and there are so many pressing urban problems affecting great numbers of people and that the media can highlight given its proximity to these urban problems," said Johnson. "This is ironic, given a recent New York Times article that called for abandoning corporate farms and returning to independent farms like the one the author grew up on in Oregon. This would be healthier for all of us and might reduce the rural suicide rate to what it was early in the last century, when it was lower than the urban rate, and when rural America, rather than desolate and lonely, was thriving and vibrant, perhaps as idyllic as it was in fable."


“Follow The Author On Twitter.”

Reality Creation Secrets

People ask me which of the books I've written are my favorite and I consistantly have to say it's "The Forbidden Book Of Getting What You Want"

You can order the book from amazon.com for $24.95 but you can also get it for nothing as part of this great offer given by my friend Enoch Tan.

Let me give you some more details.

One of my fellow authors, Enoch Tan, has compiled a very noteworthy course of material called "Reality Creation Secrets" and I think it goes hand-in-hand with my book "The Forbidden Book Of Getting What You Want".

All that I ask of you is to use this special affiliate link to check out Enoch Tan's course "Reality Creation Secrets" and if you decide to order all you have to do is email me your clickbank receipt plus shipping address and I will put the book in mail to you that day.

It's that simple and that is why I want you to save this email.

If you don't want "Reality Creation Secrets" it's no harm done but if you do like it I'll send you a complimentary copy of my book.

Just use this special link to check it out.

http://mindreality.com/cb/?a=hypKyXT5p&p=2

There is no telling how long I'm willing to keep this offer going so it's in your interest to check out "Reality Creation Secrets".

Sincerely,

Dantalion Jones

PS, Let me recap. Read about "Reality Creation Secrets" by Enoch Tan and if you decide to order I'll send you a real hold-in-your-hand, hard copy of my book "The Forbidden Book Of Getting What You Want". Here's the link: http://mindreality.com/cb/?a=hypKyXT5p&p=2

Another pop culture/Illuminati tie in ... long post

Another long post people so please beware before reading :)

Beyonce’s “Sweet Dreams” video is simply viewed by most people as being “sexy” or “fashion” but not many get its occult meaning. Hidden in the symbolism of the video and the song’s lyrics are references to dark themes: possession and mind control.

“Sweet Dreams” is in perfect continuation with the dark themes surround Beyonce’s alter-ego: dark occultism, mind control, spirit possession, etc. The lyrics of the song and the imagery of the video have a supernatural and ethereal quality, where Beyonce professes her love to someone or something she calls a “sweet dream or a beautiful nightmare”.

Essential Information
So what is this song about? Love? Yes. Love of her mind controlled state and of her controller. Pretty disturbing.

What is mind control? It is a technique developed by the CIA to literally control a subject’s mind (google MK Ultra for more info). “Monarch Programming” uses extreme treatments (such as electroshock) to cause a major trauma in the victims psyche. Ron Patton describes the main precepts of “Monarch Programming” here:

Definition and Description

“The name MONARCH is not necessarily defined within the context of royal nobility, but rather refers to the monarch butterfly. When a person is undergoing trauma induced by electroshock, a feeling of light-headedness is evidenced; as if one is floating or fluttering like a butterfly. There is also a symbolic representation pertaining to the transformation or metamorphosis of this beautiful insect: from a caterpillar to a cocoon (dormancy, inactivity ), to a butterfly (new creation) which will return to its point of origin. Such is the migratory pattern that makes this species unique.

Occultic symbolism may give additional insight into the true meaning Psyche is the word for both “soul” and “butterfly” coming from the belief that human souls become butterflies while searching for a new reincarnation.

Some ancient mystical groups, such as the Gnostics, saw the butterfly as a symbol of corrupt flesh. The “Angel of Death” (remember Mengele?) in Gnostic art works was portrayed crushing the butterfly. A marionette is a puppet that is attached to strings and is controlled by the puppet master, hence MONARCH programming is also referred to as the “Marionette Syndrome.” “Imperial Conditioning” is another term used, while some mental health therapists know it as “Conditioned Stimulus Response Sequences.” Project MONARCH could be best described as a form of structured dissociation and occultic integration, in order to compartmentalize the mind into multiple personalities within a systematic framework. During this process, a Satanic ritual, usually including Cabalistic mysticism, is performed with the purpose of attaching a particular demon or group of demons to the corresponding alter(s). Of course, most skeptics would view this as simply a means to enhance trauma within the victim, negating any irrational belief that demonic possession actually occurs.”

Alters and Triggers

Another way of examining this convoluted victimization of body and soul is by looking at it as a complex computer program: A file (alter) is created through trauma, repetition and reinforcement. In order to activate (trigger) the file, a specific access code or password (cue or command) is required. The victim/survivor is called a “slave” by the programmer/handler, who in turn is perceived as “master” or “god.” About 75% are female, since they possess a higher tolerance for pain and tend to dissociate easier than males. Subjects are used mainly for cover operations, prostitution and pornography; involvement in the entertainment industry is notable. A former military officer connected to the DIA, told this writer, “In the ‘big picture’ these people [MONARCH victims] are in all walks of life, from the bum on the street to the white-collar guy”. In corroboration, a retired CIA agent vaguely discussed the use of such personnel to be used as “plants” or “chameleons” for the purpose of infiltrating a designated group, gathering information and/or injecting an ulterior agenda.

There are an inordinate amount of alters in the victim/survivor with numerous back-up programs, mirrors and shadows. A division of light-side (good) and dark-side (bad) alters are interwoven in the mind and rotate on an axis.

One of the main internal structures, (of which their are many) within the system is shaped like a double-helix, consisting of seven levels. Each system has an internal programmer which oversees the “gatekeeper” (demons?) who grant or deny entry into the different rooms. A few of the internal images predominately seen by victims/survivors are trees, the Cabalistic “Tree of Life,” with adjoining root systems, infinity loops, ancient symbols and letters, spider webs, mirrors or glass shattering, masks, castles, mazes, demons/monsters/aliens, sea shells, butterflies, snakes, ribbons, bows, flowers, hour glasses, clocks, robots, chain-of-command diagrams and/or schematics of computer circuitry boards.

Source: http://www.whale.to/b/patton.html


MK Ultra Victim (1961) OK, this heavy stuff but there are some important points to note that are directly related to “Sweet Dreams”:

Monarch treatment gives a feeling of “light-headeness, as if one is floating”
It engenders a new creation, an alternate personality
The victim sees his controller as “god”
Dark occult rituals are involved in the process
Symbols relating to Monarch programming involve mirrors, glass shattering rainbows, robots and more.
I’m guessing that you’re starting to see where I’m going with this. All of these things are represented in Beyonce’s 4 minute video. How much can one honestly attribute to coincidence? The truth is: “Sweet Dreams” is a metaphor for mind control, Monarch Programming to be precise, and Beyonce sings from the point of view of the programmed slave.

Song Analysis
“Every night I rush to my bed
With hopes that maybe I’ll get a chance to see you
When I close my eyes I’m going out of my head
Lost in a fairytale, can you hold my hands and be my guide?”

Beyonce is looking forward to “go out of her head” and get “lost in a fairytale“. She is asking her controller to “hold her hand and be her guide“. The state of a mind controlled slave is often compared to a fairytale (they are said to be shown movies such as The Wizard of Oz). The controller will be her guide in the treatments.

“Clouds filled with stars cover the skies
And I hope it rains, you’re the perfect lullaby
What kinda dream is this?”

There is a real sense of a hazy state of mind. Beyonce says to her controller, who is causing in her this mental state, “you’re the perfect lullaby”.

“You could be a sweet dream or a beautiful nightmare
Either way I don’t wanna wake up from you
(Turn the lights on)

Sweet dream or a beautiful nightmare
Somebody pinch me, your love’s too good to be true
(Turn the lights on)”

So this state of mind control can be a sweet dream, which is a blissful state where the boundaries between reality and fiction are blurred. It can also be a nightmare due to the traumatizing treatments, the mental anguish and the fact that being a Monarch slave is probably the worst thing that can happen to someone. Sweet dream/Beautiful Nightmare also describes the dichotomy between Beyonce and her dark alter-ego Sasha Fierce. As Patton stated about mind control:

“A division of light-side (good) and dark-side (bad) alters are interwoven in the mind and rotate on an axis.”
-Ibid.

“My guilty pleasure, I ain’t going no where
Baby long as you’re here I’ll be floating on air”

“My guilty pleasure” refers to the fact that she knows that this state of synthetically bliss is false and ultimately harmful to her. But as long as her controller is there, she’ll be “floating on air”. This is especially significant when one knows that subjects to Monarch programming get a feeling of light-headeness, as if they’re floating.

“I mention you when I say my prayers
I wrap you around all of my thoughts
Boy you’re my temporary high”

There is here a mix of the “scientific” mind programming with the occult ritualistic aspect of it. The “controller” is often interchanged with Lucifer and “mind control” can be interchanged with spirit possession. As Ron Patton stated, ancient occult knowledge, rituals and magick are incorporated in the programming of the subject. The person sees the controller as a god, or Lucifer, who possesses his/her soul and thoughts. Beyonce says she mentions the name of her controller (or Lucifer) when she says her prayers. She wraps her controller around all of her thoughts which is a nice way of saying that the possessor is in control of her thoughts.

“Tattoo your name across my heart so it will remain
Not even death can make us part
What kind of dream is this?”

She is basically saying that she gave her soul to her controller aka Lucifer. “Not even death can make us part“, conveys an obvious spiritual meaning. The only thing that remains of us after death is our soul. She says that even after death, her soul will still be owned by her possessor.

Like all works of art, the lyrics could be interpreted in numerous ways. The video however confirms the mind control theme of the song by visually representing the steps, the symbols and even many “triggers” associated with Monarch programming.

Video Analysis
So what is the message of the video? Yes, I know Beyonce is “hawt”. Now that we got that out of the way, we can look past her hawtness…There’s way more to that video than hypnotic robot breasts.

The video starts with Beyonce sleeping to a creepy lullaby tune. A dove appears and levitates Beyonce from her bed while the lullaby gets increasingly menacing. This scene ends with a scream of terror.
In Christian symbolism, the dove represents the Holy Spirit. There’s however nothing “holy” about that scene. The scene is dark, the music is ominous, Beyonce is troubled and she gets lifted in what looks like a feat of black magick. To find to true meaning of that dove, one has to go into its occult meaning.

“Helena Blavatsky, an occultist, Luciferian, magician, Mason, and founder of the Theosophical Society, along with Masonic author Albert Pike, in their writings of this belief, that Lucifer is the holy spirit. Pike, referred to the Holy Ghost, when he wrote, “the body of the Holy Spirit, the universal Agent, [is] the Serpent…”

The Holy Spirit of Occult Orders, the liaison between the earth realm and the heavens is Lucifer. This is graphically represented on the lamen of the luciferian fraternity Ordo Templi Orientis.


Lamen of the O.T.O. Upside dove = Fall of Lucifer?

So in the first scene of the video, we see Lucifer lifting Beyonce from her bed and sending her to a kind of weird heaven. As stated above, the song is at the same time, about Lucifer and Beyonce’s mind controller. So the dove also represents the controller making Beyonce feel light-headed from Monarch programming.

Beyonce is sent into an “alternate world” with an omnipresent rainbow, a symbol associated with Monarch programming. We often see in the video multiple Beyonce’s colliding into one or the opposite, which represent her alters or minions. If you look closely at the backup dancers in one particular scene, they are literally broken in half, as if they are not activated.


Notice the rainbow, the importance of the light source (Lucifer = god of Light)…And is this a pale horse running in the background? In this symbolic scene, Beyonce is in a mirror room, not knowing who the “real Beyonce” is. This scene refers to the dissociative nature of mind control, not to mention that mirrors are an all-important symbol of Monarch Programming.

Mirror reflections symbolism She then shatters a mirror and fragments fly all over the place, which represents the fragmentation and compartmentalization of her consciousness, an important prerequisite in order to create a new alternate personality in Monarch programming.

Then it happens. The shiny new robot Beyonce, the new programmed alternate personality is born.
New controlled Beyonce trying in vain to get back the fragments of her consciousness What is a robot? It is a machine that is programmed to accomplish specific tasks. This description also describes a mind-controlled slave. So the video described the steps of mind control and the metamorphosis of the worm into a Monarch butterfly.

To Conclude
Beyonce’s “Sweet Dreams” describes the blissful journey of a mind control subject towards its new persona. Even if that process is insanely painful and nightmarish, the subject is programmed to enjoy it, hence the phrase “either way, I don’t want to wake up from you“. Numerous symbols and mind control triggers are included in the video and, combined with the dissociative lyrics, the song leaves no doubt to those “in the know” of its occult meaning.

Why are there allusions to Lucifer and mind control in the video and many others? What’s the purpose of it? Is it supposed to have an effect on the viewers? Are those types of videos megarituals acting on the subconscious of music fans? Are they preparing (programming) the new generation to accept those things as a reality? Those are questions I’m still attempting to answer. One thing is for sure: when one realizes that Beyonce’s incredible beauty and talent are used to promote such horrors, the video becomes indeed a “beautiful nightmare”.
Sponsored Link

The Conspiracy Time Line

Discovery Channel's The Colony: Armageddon is the New Black

Alright, we get it. The world is ending, okay?! 2012. Carriers. Daybreakers. The apocalypse and post-apocalyptic scenarios have been continually rehashed even before "Armageddon" exploded its way into our pre-teen hearts. But now, the freakin' Discovery channel is cashing in on the end of the world party, by airing a post-civilization reality show called "The Colony." What the hell, right?




Other networks are scrambling to find their own fuck-the-world's-ending programming (re-airing exploitative Y2K movies doesn't count, ABC). For example, The History Channel recently announced that it will be working to redevelope it's shittastic "Life After People" into a new series called "Life After People With A Few People Left." But let's see what makes "The Colony" stand apart:

The producers have apparently shied away from certain Hollywood buzz words though, deeming the show not "post-apocalyptic" (because bands of people will come try to steal their food, making the participants likely to take reality show hunger complaining to a new level). Also, the ten people featured in the show are not "contestants" but "participants," because there is no Survivor-like voting or staged contests (And here we were looking forward to a classic hobo-off.)

So how does it stack-up against this summer's crop of post-apocalyptic material? And is it more or less creepy than CBS's Kid Nation?

The Non-confrontational response

From Mind Control Wiki

This is a response to a confrontation question that

a) acknowledges the questions and

b) does not permit the topic to escalate.

The questions or comments by their nature often can put the person on the defensive and might be something like "I saw you look at that girl." or "Don't you think all raisers of hamsters should be fined for animal cruelty?"

The non-confrontational response would be a simple shrug. That's it, a shrug.

Another response would be to simply acknowledge with a "Hmm." and nothing more.

Other questions are even more confrontational "Why do you ALWAYS leave the cap off the toothpaste?" and are best recognized as tools the questioner asks in order to gain control. They do NOT want information about your motives for not using the toothpaste cap.

A non-confrontational response to that question would be "I understand what you are saying." If the questioner persists in using these types of control questions they can be followed by simple acknowledgments that lack any direct answer to the question "I see...", "I hear what you're say." or "That really IS the question."

This type of response prevents the conversation from progressing into anger and defensiveness and gives all the emotional issues back to the questioner.

Another example of a non-confrontational response is when someone is reacting in a passive aggressive way. For example you are leaving to meet with friends and your significant other angrily says "I hope you have fun." The key to this is to NOT respond emotionally and say CALMLY "I don't think you're being honest with me." When asked to explain say, calmly again, "You tone sounds angry. I feel as if my fun isn't your real concern... so I don't think you're being honest with me."

To respond with ANY emotion, sarcasm, or passive aggressive would be counter-productive. To respond with defensiveness would likely initiate further passive aggression.

You'll find that when done in a calm, curious and matter-of-fact tone it will defuse the aggression and encourage the person to be more honest.

Rapport

From The Mind Control Wiki

Rapport is often defined as "liking" but this is not completely accurate. Rapport occurs in a relationship when one person is responsive to another.

In NLP terms, rapport means you demonstrate understanding of the other person’s model of the world. It has nothing to do with the other person liking you (at first). In fact two enemies can have rapport.

If you examine the above definition the key word is "demonstrate understanding" and does not mean that one actually has to understand the other person's model of the world.

Rapport is one of the most important features or characteristics of unconscious human interaction. It is commonality of perspective, being in "sync", being on the same "wavelength" as the person with whom you are talking.

Here is an acronym for Rapport

R-really

A- all

P- people

P- prefer

O-others

R-resembling

T- them

Rapport and Mirroring and Matching

There are a number of techniques that are supposed to be beneficial in building rapport such as: matching your body language (ie, posture, gesture, and so forth); maintaining eye contact; and matching breathing rhythm. Some of these techniques are explored in neuro-linguistic programming.

One of these techniques is called "mirroring and matching" in which the person wanting to establish rapport will reflect back movements and gestures back to the other person. In order to avoid the perception of mimicry in "monkey-see-monkey-do" fashion a pause of about 5 seconds is given before perfectly mirroring another person.

Influence trainer, Tom Vizzini, suggests that mirroring and matching do not cause rapport but are a result of rapport.

Assuming Rapport

An easier and more immediate method of gaining rapport than mirroring and matching is to assume you already have it.

How do you do this? You just do it. Assume this person is your long lost friend or that you've had a very long and reliable relationship. It's easier than you might think.

Retrieved from "http://www.mindcontrol101.com/wiki/index.php?title=Rapport"


Don't miss this chance!

I sent you a free report by my friend song chengxiang on the other day. I just want to make sure that you get it...

...because it is probably the best fr.ee report you can ever get with profound information that will change your life forever!

http://www.quantum-mind-power-system.com

I know how it feels after spending our valuable time and effort studying the FREE stuff we got from the internet, but we end up getting NOTHING useful.

That's the matter of fact--99.9% of the FREE stuff we received in our inbox everyday has little or no value AT ALL. It's just a waste of energy and time reading them.

BUT...this report "The Core Sollution" will NOT waste your time. I PROMISE.

I have learned a great deal from this amazing report!

It's really eye-opening!

I never thought of the idea that every problem and every frustration we have in our lives are caused by only ONE thing!

The method that song used to discover this ROOT CAUSE is revolutionary!

You'll be amazed when you see the logical step-by-step process to find out the root cause of all life problems!

Best of all, Song not only helps you to find out the root cause, but also gives you the core solution!

Don't wait for another second, this report is going to change your life!

Here is the link to get your copy:

http://www.quantum-mind-power-system.com

To your success
Dantalion Jones


PS. This kind of FREE stuff with TRUTH VALUE is really hard to find on the internet today.

Don't miss this chance!

Here is the link to get your copy again:

http://www.quantum-mind-power-system.com

PPS. Feel free to forward this email to anyone who you think can benefit from it.

It's not your fault.

This is exciting!

I've got an amazing 17-page FRÉÉ report from my friend Song chengxiang!

He shared a powerful and logical way to find out the root cause of every problem you have in life.

Best of all, he also tells you the exact techniques and strategies that you can use immediately to eliminate the cause such that transform your life completely!

Here is the link to get your copy:

http://www.quantum-mind-power-system.com

A lot of people blame themselves when they find themselves not making any progress after years of frustration by following the experts' advice for making a happier, wealthier and healthier life.

They think, 'maybe there is something wrong with me...' or 'I just could NOT make my life work'

What my friend song chengxiang has made crystal clear for you in the report is:

IT's NOT YOUR FAULT!

Here is why!

99.9% of the popular books or programs on self improvement are only dealing with the symptoms of your life problems or frustrations, NOT the true causes.

For example, if you have financial problems, you will be adviced to take the EXPENSIVE wealth building seminars that teach you a bunch of money making strategies.

BUT, the fact of matter is that your financial problems are not caused by your lack of money-making ideas, but by something deeper and more fundamental.

If you have relationship problems, people will advise you to go to relationship experts who can tell you tons of tips and strategies to improve your relationship.

BUT you will still find that the fulfilling loving relationship that you have dreamed of is still out of your reach. That's because your relationship problems are only symptoms, not the fundamental causes.

THEN,WHAT IS THE FUNDAMENTAL ROOT CAUSE of ALL YOUR LIFE PROBLEMS?

This 17-page Special Report helps you discover the ROOT CAUSE, and teach you two powerful AND simple techniques to remove the root cause, such totally transform your life. and I think you'll get a lot out of it, as I did.

Here is the link to get your copy:

http://www.quantum-mind-power-system.com

Again, it's totally F*R*E*E.

It's great stuff, and doesn't cost you a penny.

Use it to make things better in your life today,

To your success
Dantalion Jones

PS. Please don't write this off as "worthless" or "a waste of time" because it's free.

The techniques revealed in this report are some of the most powerful techniques you can ever learn.

This info is probably more valuable than any of the $5,000 seminars you have attended.

The link to go to, once more, is...

http://www.quantum-mind-power-system.com

PPS. Feel free to forward this email to any of your friends that needs it the most.

French unease at telecom suicides

Read the article and tell me what you think.

Dantalion Jones
= = = =

French Labour Minister Xavier Darcos is to meet the head of the country's main telecommunications company to discuss a number of suicides among its staff.

Twenty-three employees of France Telecom have killed themselves since the beginning of 2008.

Unions blame tough management methods at the multinational, which was privatised in 1998.

But France Telecom says the rate of suicides is statistically not unusual for a company with a 100,000 workforce.

According to the World Health Organization, France had an annual suicide rate of 26.4 for 100,000 men in 2008. The rate for women was 9.2 suicides per 100,000.

The latest suicide occurred on Friday, when a 32-year-old woman leapt to her death at a France Telecom office in Paris.

On Wednesday, a 49-year-old man in Troyes, east of Paris, plunged a knife into his own stomach during a meeting in which he had been told he was being transferred.

He is being treated in hospital.

Counselling

Mr Darcos is to meet France Telecom chief executive Didier Lombard early next week, a spokesman for the labour ministry announced on Saturday.

The unions say a never-ending drive for efficiency is causing emotional havoc in the workforce - especially among older employees recruited when France Telecom was part of the public sector.

Since privatisation in 1998 some 40,000 jobs have gone, and unions say there is pressure on many employees either to leave or to accept new working conditions.

The management of France Telecom denies that there has been a sudden increase in the suicide rate.

It points out that in the year 2000 there were 28 suicides in the company - a figure which it says is statistically not unusual.

France Telecom says most suicides are prompted by personal, not professional, causes.

However, a BBC correspondent in Paris says the firm concedes that the cultural and organisational changes required by the move from French public monopoly to a competitive multinational were bound to cause stress.

After the latest cases it has promised to hire more counselling staff and to suspend internal job transfers pending new talks with the unions.

Story from BBC NEWS:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/pr/fr/-/2/hi/europe/8252547.stm



Learn How The Illuminati Wants to
CONTROL YOUR MIND


Too beautiful to ignore

There are times I run into things that are just too beautiful to ignore... and they have nothing to do with mind control.

This video is one of them.

Enjoy,
Dantalion

Birds on the Wires from Jarbas Agnelli on Vimeo.

Protected fear memories

This could be useful stuff when performing trauma based mind control. To find out more click this link.

(PhysOrg.com) -- In the latest issue of Science, researchers from the Friedrich Miescher Institute for Biomedical Research, Switzerland, show how a class of proteins surrounding nerve cells allows fear memories to persist despite extensive fear extinction therapy.

Hands are sweaty, the pulse is running, the mouth is dry. Speaking in front of a large audience is not everybody's most treasured activity. It can be even terrifying. However, practice and some breathing techniques can improve matters. Learning how not to be fearful is possible. Still, all the coping skills cannot guarantee that stage fright doesn't strike again.

A study by the groups of Andreas LĂ¼thi and Pico Caroni from the Friedrich Miescher Institute of Biomedical Research, an institute of the Novartis Research Foundation, sheds a novel light on the question, why fear is almost impossible to get rid of - not even with extensive training. The scientists show in the latest issue of the renowned scientific journal Science that a glycoprotein class called chondroitin sulphate proteoglycans (CSPGs) supports the preservation of fear memories.

This protein forms a dense, highly organized extracellular mesh, called perineuronal net (PNN), surrounding nerve cells in the amygdala, the area of the brain controlling fear. In their experiments the scientists could show that the PNN hinders fear extinction. In the presence of the PNN, fear extinction therapy creates new, learned memories of how to deal with a fearful situation. Both, fear and fear extinction memories co-exist and will be called forward depending on the situation. This mechanism explains why a person with stage fright may be coping fine when talking to a smaller group but is speechless in front of a large audience.

In the absence of PNNs, however, fear memories become prone to erasure. Once the scientists degraded the mesh of CSPGs in the amygdala, fear memories were lost. The fear was gone.

The study uncovers a totally novel, molecular mechanism by which fear memories are preserved and protected from erasure. It is highly relevant from a clinical perspective because fear memory extinction is the corner-stone of the psychological therapy of several anxiety disorders. Furthermore, it puts forward a novel explanation for the frequency of relapses of fear responses after extensive therapy, which are a major clinical problem.

Anxiety disorders
The term "anxiety disorder" covers a variety of abnormal and pathological anxieties and fears, including phobias, panic disorders, obsessive compulsive disorders and post-traumatic stress disorders. The current course of therapy includes both cognitive behavioral therapy as well as pharmaceutical therapy. In anxiety treatment, cognitive behavioral therapy exposes the patient gradually to the feared stimulus. Through this exposure, patients unlearn their fear reactions. Almost every fifth person in the United States has been reported with an anxiety disorder in a recent study.


Learn How The Illuminati Wants to
CONTROL YOUR MIND


The New Science of Learning

(PhysOrg.com) -- According to recent studies, young children learn best through social interaction. Andrew Meltzoff and his colleagues at the University of Washington are studying an emerging field called the "Science of Learning," which re-evaluates how children learn in formal and informal settings.

"We're finding that social aspects of learning are very important at all ages," said Meltzoff, who explained that this is especially the case for young children who learn "most rapidly and most effectively from other people."

Infants and young children learn from imitation and by following the actions of those around them, adopting mannerisms and speech patterns. Yet technology, such as television and computers, is changing how children learn and communicate, often replacing face-to-face human interaction.

A study compared the effectiveness of television and audio programs to live human interaction when learning a second language. Nine-month-old American children were exposed to Chinese by using three approaches: an auditory soundtrack, a DVD with picture and sound, and live human interaction while playing and reading books. The goal was to see which one of these approaches allowed the children to learn best.

The results were that the American children who interacted with a live tutor quickly learned basic aspects of Chinese. However, American children who were exposed to Chinese through the auditory soundtrack and DVD showed no learning.

Today, a variety of technology, such as cell phones, instant messaging and other computer programs allows children to multitask. Meltzoff explained that "We're not sure of the long-term consequences of raising children in a digital world with the level of multitasking that there is, and perhaps a cut-back on face-to-face social interaction."

For better or for worse, our means of learning and communicating are evolving. What remains clear for now is that social interaction is crucial to how children learn and comprehend the world around them.

Another Video about Hollywood Conspiracy

As you look at this video, there are two things that never cease to amaze me.

First, a persons ability to find meaning in coincidence: That an overpass in a movie reads Warning 9' 11'' as if had we only paid attention to the message we could have seen it.

Secondly, that smart people can overlook the possibility that movie makers are visual artists that NEED to tap into cultural symbols like the eye in the pyramid. Oh Noooo... they're part of a ultra secret conspiracy.

Anyway, go ahead and comment if you think I'm out of line.

~Dantalion Jones

Cults, Conspiracies, and Secret Societies a compendium of all things cloaked and covert

Large Image

So you think the fillings in your teeth are receiving clandestine radio signals from the World Bank. What to do? First, see your doctor. Second, start studying New York author Arthur Goldwag’s smart new compendium of all things cloaked and covert, Cults, Conspiracies, and Secret Societies: The Straight Scoop on Freemasons, the Illuminati, Skull and Bones, Black Helicopters, the New World Order, and Many, Many More (Vintage, $19.95). With clever little essays on everything from the Order of the Solar Temple to the Symbionese Liberation Army, Goldwag has created a book that’s hard to stop reading—the equivalent of eating a bowl of peanuts (with the accent on nuts ). By the end, you have a clear image of the “thought contagion” that sometimes causes people to lose the plot so completely that they have to make one up.

Secret camps and guillotines? Groups make ‘birthers’ look sane

WASHINGTON — Is the federal government building secret camps to lock up people who criticize President Barack Obama?

Will it truck off young people to camps to brainwash them into liking Obama’s agenda? Are government officials planning to replicate the French Revolution’s Reign of Terror, using the guillotine to silence their domestic enemies?

No. The charges, of course, are not true.

However, the accusations are out there, a series of fantastic claims fed by paranoia about the government. They’re spread and sometimes cross-pollinated via the Internet. They feed a fringe subset of the anger at the government percolating through the country, one that ignites passion, but also helps Obama’s allies to discount broader anger at the president’s agenda.

In one, retired FBI agent Ted Gunderson says the government has prepared 1,000 camps for its own citizens. He also says the government has stored 30,000 guillotines to murder its critics, and has stashed 500,000 caskets in Georgia and Montana for the remains.

Why guillotines? "Because," he wrote in a report obtained by the Southern Poverty Law Center, which tracks hate groups, "beheading is the most efficient means of harvesting body parts."

In a second warning, the Web site Worldnetdaily.com says that the government is considering Nazi-like concentration camps for dissidents.

Jerome Corsi, the author of "The Obama Nation," an anti-Obama book, says that a proposal in Congress "appears designed to create the type of detention center that those concerned about use of the military in domestic affairs fear could be used as concentration camps for political dissidents, such as occurred in Nazi Germany."

Another Web site, Americanfreepress.net, says the proposal "would create a Guantanamo-style setting after martial law is declared."

There’s no evidence of such a plan.

In truth, Rep. Alcee Hastings, D-Fla., has proposed a bill that would order the Homeland Security Department to prepare national emergency centers — to provide temporary housing and medical facilities in national emergencies such as hurricanes. The bill also would allow the centers to be used to train first responders, and for "other appropriate needs, as determined by the Secretary of Homeland Security."

In another ominous warning, a group called the Oathkeepers boasts that it wouldn’t cooperate if the government orders dissidents locked up.

"We will NOT obey any order to force American citizens into any form of detention camps under any pretext," the group says in its list of top principles.

Oathkeepers is built around the idea that its members — active and retired military, police and firefighters — all have taken an oath to defend the Constitution, not the federal government.

Whether inspired by the group or not, the message of loyalty to the Constitution has been heard in many of the angry protests in town hall meetings this summer against a proposed health care overhaul — often side by side with the suggestion that the health care proposal is unconstitutional.

U.S. Rep. Michele Bachmann, R-Minn., also is worried about the federal government and children, saying a bill expanding the AmeriCorps volunteer service could lead to mandatory camps for young people.

"There is a very strong chance that we will see that young people will be put into mandatory service," Bachmann told a Minnesota radio station.

"And the real concern is that there are provisions for what I would call re-education camps for young people, where young people have to go and get trained in a philosophy that the government puts forward and then they have to go to work in some of these politically correct forums."

http://www.bostonherald.com/news/us_politics/view/20090829secret_camps_and_guillotines_groups_make_birthers_look_sane/


Why 'Unrealistic' Goals Are Easier to Achieve

Large Image

By Tim Ferris
Excerpt from The 4-Hour Work Week

I had to bribe them. What other choice did I have?

My lecture at Princeton had just ended with smiles and enthusiastic questions.

At the same time, I knew that most students would go out and promptly do the opposite of what I preached. Most of them would be putting in 80-hour weeks as high-paid coffee fetchers unless I showed that the principles from class could actually be applied.

Hence the challenge.

I was offering a round-trip ticket anywhere in the world to anyone who could complete an undefined “challenge” in the most impressive fashion possible. Results plus style. I told them to meet me after class if interested, and here they were, nearly 20 out of 60 students.

The task was designed to test their comfort zones while forcing them to use some of the tactics I teach. It was simplicity itself: contact three seemingly impossible-to-reach people — J Lo., Warren Buffett, Bill Clinton, J.D. Salinger, I don’t care — and get at least one to reply to three questions…

Of 20 students, all frothing at the mouth to win a free spin across the globe, how many completed it?

Exactly… none. Not a one.

Bigger Goals = Less Competition

There were many excuses: “It’s not that easy to get someone to…”, “I have a big paper due, and…,” “I would love to, but there’s no way I can…” There was but one real reason, however, repeated over and over again in different words: it was a difficult challenge, perhaps impossible, and the other students would out-do them. Since all of them overestimated the competition, no one even showed up.

According to the default-win rules I had set, if someone had sent me no more than an illegible one-paragraph response, I would have been obligated to give them the prize. This result both fascinated and depressed me.

The following year, the outcome was quite different.

I told this cautionary tale and six out of 17 finished the challenge in less than 48 hours. Was the second class better? No. In fact, there were more capable students in the first class, but they did nothing. Firepower up the wazoo and no trigger finger.

The second group just embraced what I told them before they started, which was…

Doing the Unrealistic is Easier Than Doing the Realistic

From contacting billionaires [here’s how one reader did it] to rubbing elbows with celebrities—the second group of students did both—it’s as easy as believing it can be done.

It’s lonely at the top. 99% of the world is convinced they are incapable of achieving great things, so they aim for the mediocre middle-ground. The level of competition is thus fiercest for “realistic” goals, paradoxically making them the most time- and energy-consuming. It is easier to raise $10,000,000 than it is $1,000,000. It is easier to pick up the one perfect 10 in the bar than the five 8s.

If you are insecure, guess what? The rest of the world is too. Do not overestimate the competition and underestimate yourself. You are better than you think.

Unreasonable and unrealistic goals are easier to achieve for yet another reason.

Having an unusually large goal is an adrenaline infusion that provides the endurance to overcome the inevitable trials and tribulations that go along with any goal. Realistic goals, goals restricted to the average ambition level, are uninspiring and will only fuel you through the first or second problem, at which point you throw in the towel.

If the potential payoff is mediocre or average, so is your effort. I’ll run through walls to get a catamaran trip through the Greek islands, but I might not change my brand of cereal for a weekend trip through Columbus, Ohio. If I choose the latter because it is “realistic,” I won’t have the enthusiasm to jump even the smallest hurdle to accomplish it. With beautiful, crystal-clear Greek waters and delicious wine on the brain, I’m prepared to do battle for a dream that is worth dreaming. Even though their difficulty of achievement on a scale of 1-10 appears to be a 2 and a 10 respectively, Columbus is more likely to fall through.

The fishing is best where the fewest go, and the collective insecurity of the world makes it easy for people to hit homeruns while everyone else is aiming for base hits. There is just less competition for bigger goals.

Timothy Ferris is the author of The 4-Hour Work Week.

Scientist: Human brain could be replicated in 10 years

NOTE: This would be a great thing to make true. If we can create a human brain it means that soon we can create artificial humans that we can abuse and exploit with impunity.

~Dantalion Jones

http://www.physorg.com/news171565512.html

Activity in the brain's neocortex is tightly controlled by inhibitory neurons shown here which prevent epilepsy (Blue Brain Project; Ecole Polytechnique Federale de Lausanne)

A model that replicates the functions of the human brain is feasible in 10 years according to neuroscientist Professor Henry Markram of the Brain Mind Institute in Switzerland. ‘I absolutely believe it is technically and biologically possible. The only uncertainty is financial. It is an extremely expensive project and not all is yet secured.'

The apparent complexity of the human mind is not a barrier to building a ‘replica' brain claims Professor Markram. ‘The brain is of course extremely complex because it has trillions of synapses, billions of neurons, millions of proteins, and thousands of genes. But they are still finite in number. Today's technology is already highly sophisticated and it allows us to reverse engineer the brain rapidly'. An example of the capability already in place is that today's robots can do screenings and mappings tens of thousands of times faster than human scientists and technicians.

Another hurdle on the path to a model human brain is that 100 years of neuroscience discovery has led to millions of fragments of data and knowledge that have never been brought together and exploited fully. ‘Actually no- one even knows what we already understand about the brain', says Professor Markram, ‘A model would serve to bring this all together and then allow anyone to test whatever theory you want about the brain. The biggest challenge is to understand how electrical-magnetic-chemical patterns in the brain convert into our perception of reality. We think we see with our eyes, but in fact most of what we ‘see' is generated as a projection by your brain. So what are we actually looking at when we look at something ‘outside' of us?'

For Professor Markram, the most exciting part of his research is putting together the hundreds of thousands of small pieces of data that his lab has collected over the past 15 years, and seeing what a microcircuit of the brain looks like. ‘When we first switched it on it already started to display some interesting emergent properties. But this is just the beginning because we know now that it is possible to build it. As we progress we are learning about design secrets of our brains which were unimaginable before. In fact the brain uses some simple rules to solve highly complex problems and extracting each of these rules one by one is very exciting. For example we have been surprised at finding simple design principles that allow billions of neurons to connect to each other. I think we will understand how the brain is designed and works before we have finished building it'.

The opportunities for this neuroscience research challenge are immense explains Professor Markram: ‘A brain model will sit on a massive supercomputer and serve as a kind of educational and diagnostic service to society. As the industrial revolution in science progresses we will generate more data than anyone can track or any computer can store, so models that can absorb it are simply unavoidable. It is also essential to build models when it comes to treating brain diseases affecting around two billion people. At present, there is no brain disease for which we really understand what has gone wrong in the processing, in the circuits, neurons or synapses. It is also important if we are to replace the need for the millions of animal experiments each year for brain research'.

Discover The Long Lost Incredible Mind Power Secrets


Mind Power Secrets Package
http://www.ArticleBrain.com/MindSecrets

You're about to get a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity to access
"insider" shortcuts to creating a sensational life. With all this
knowledge at your fingertips, you could easily become wealthy
or even famous. You could easily be a groundbreaking author,
teacher, visionary, inventor, royal advisor, and other things.
Dozens of new opportunities open up to you because your
entire context of knowledge is highly advanced. Your chances
of success are multiplied thousands of times over ordinary citizens...

A complete description of reality... FINALLY

If you suffer from an overwhelming sense of dread brought on by the realization of your own insignificance in the universe, then you need Elder Sign. Visit Elder Sign dot ca.

The Top Ten Sci-Fi Mind Control Movies

http://www.scifisquad.com

'X-Men'

We've seen the ads, we've seen a trailer, but we really have no idea what to expect from this week's release of Gamer. Except that it's directed by Mark Neveldine and Brian Taylor, the madmen of action cinema, and it's set in the near future, and it concerns an online game that involves mind control. Cool! If we're lucky, maybe we can figure out what's happening before a migraine sets in from all the on-screen insanity sure to be unleashed from the people behind Crank and Crank High Voltage.

Focusing on the mind control angle for a moment led me to think about all the great sci-fi movies that have played around with the idea of remote control mental gymnastics. The adolescent brain immediately seizes on the possibilities inherent in stripping unsuspecting young ladies down to the buff (thanks a lot, Zapped!), yet the more mature thinker wonders about deeper issues, like what to do with a woman who will only go out with you because you gave her no choice.

1. X-Men
Bryan Singer wove the mind control battle between Professor Charles Xavier (Patrick Stewart) and Magneto (Ian McKellan) into the fabric of the story. You could enjoy Wolverine (Hugh Jackman) discovering a fuller range of his powers, sympathize with the desperate plight of Rogue (Anna Paquin), admire Jean Grey (Famke Janssen), or simply try and stare through the body paint covering Mystique (Rebecca Romijn). Lurking in the background, though, was a duel between good and evil, with Professor Xavier favoring gentle nudges in the right direction and Magneto ready to wage an all-out war.



'Star Wars'2. Star Wars Episode IV: A New Hope
Boy, it'll be hard to keep George Lucas' original trilogy off these lists for very long. We must put aside personal animosity, however, and honor the Jedi Mind Trick. "These are not the droids you want." C'mon! Hasn't everybody used that line in some twisted fashion? Hasn't the standard response to "Where are my keys?" become "Use the Force, Luke"?! Whereas most of science fiction -- both cinema and literature -- leans toward the idea that mind control is a bad thing, Lucas posited the bold premise that controlling the minds of others was actually in service of the greater good. Which is pretty scary when you think about it.

'Invasion of the Body Snatchers' (1956)3. Invasion of the Body Snatchers (1956) / Invasion of the Body Snatchers (1978)
Two sides of the same coin, in a rare case where the original's primitive pleasures, powered by the seductive direction of the great Don Siegel and the off-kilter realistic insanity of Kevin McCarthy in the central role, are complemented by the subversive insinuations of the remake by Philip Kaufman. Each provided sly rebuttals to the political winds prevailing at the time of their release: Siegel's a slap at Joseph McCarthy conservatism in 1956, and Kaufman's a rebuke of the pious liberal, San Francisco hippy platitudes still espoused in 1978. In other words: before you cross the broad Mind Control Boulevard, remember to look both ways; you never know who might try to make you conform to their way of thinking.

'Videodrome'4. Videodrome
What evil lurks in the heart of sleazy cable TV executives? Describing James Woods as "sleazy" is redundant (no personal offense intended -- we're talking screen image), but he's perfectly cast, because his transgressions pale in comparison to what he discovers when he goes in search of more sensational shows to goose ratings and his reputation. In David Cronenberg's bleak vision, television is the ultimate mind control device. Did you really think that plopping your kids down in front of the television for hours at a time would be a good thing?

'Firestarter'5. Firestarter
What do you get when you mix two telekinetics? A pyrokinetic, of course, in the form of nine-year-old Charlie (Drew Barrymore, of course). Daddy David Keith is the actual mind-controller, but he plays second fiddle to his fiery daughter, who gives great stare. Gertie, what have they done to you? Later, when the young actress sowed her wild oats in public, I wonder how many people were afraid to say anything because they were afraid she might stare at them and cause them to burst into flames? Fiction, man: it's a bitch. For which we should all give thanks that, once upon a time, Stephen King was cranking out books that got right to the point.

'Planet of the Vampires'6. Planet of the Vampires
The great Mario Bava struck terror into the hearts of men with his fable about man's inhumanity to man -- oops, wrong movie, this one is about astronauts who fall prey to a race of alien creatures who vant to suck their blood, or at least their life force, so they can possess the very useful bodies that the astronauts are lugging around with them. As Jeffrey M. Anderson wrote, "the plot and storytelling are fairly ludicrous, and it's mainly Bava's masterful invention behind the camera that makes the film work. His movement and timing provide an atmosphere that clearly wasn't there in the script." Although, we must acknowledge that the idea of mind-controlling aliens was highly original in 1935. Too bad this movie wasn't made until 1965.

'Invaders From Mars'7. Invaders From Mars
We'll forget the abomination of the 1986 remake and go right back to William Cameron Menzies' original. Telling the story of an alien invasion through the eyes of a young boy is a brilliant way to capture the hearts of all young boys, who already imagine that their parents are aliens and secretly wish that they were orphans, the better to idealize a life of noble suffering. (Or was that just me?) If you can pawn it all off on brain-snatching aliens, so much the better. Mike Ward of Pop Matters posted a hilariously over-thought review / essay on 50s imperialism and psycho sexuality; me, I just thought it was a cute movie with a dreadful ending.

'Destroy All Monsters'8. Destroy All Monsters
All bow down to IshirĂ´ Honda, also a major creative force behind Gojira (Godzilla, if you must), Rodan, Mothra, and Matango, Destroy All Monsters popped onto the hip, swinging cinema scene of 1968, daring to postulate that aliens could control the minds of Earth's most fearsome monsters -- helpfully imprisoned on one small island in the Pacific -- to try and destroy mankind. As if! Underneath all that latex, those monsters are definitely on the side of humanity, and no mind-controlling alien race will be able to turn them against us friendly earthlings ... for very long, that is. (Read the awesome appreciation at Stomp Tokyo for more insight.)

'Village of the Damned' (1960)9. Village of the Damned
Ooh, those little devils, with their funny eyes and the lockstep conformity and their eerie way of ignoring their parents! Of course, I'm referring to Wolf Rilla's 1960 original, which sent chills up and down my spine -- not from fright, but from gleeful envy! I was a wee little lad, always one of the smallest in class, but what if I could control everyone with the power of my noggin? Talk about youthful fantasies fulfilled!

'RoboCop'10. RoboCop
Sorry to repeat a title from last week's Top Ten -- Sci-Fi Deaths, weren't you paying attention? -- but even more than the blood spattering and bureaucracy run amuck, Paul Verhoeven's film traffics in the idea that dead cops are ripe to become corporate puppets, cruelly corrupting the promise that bravery and loyalty should be rewarded, not trashed into parody. Alex Murphy (Peter Weller) must fight his well-honed instincts to protect and to serve, because his masters are not worth dying for.

Carrots are better than sticks for building human cooperation

Rewards go further than punishment in building human cooperation and benefiting the common good, according to research published this week in the journal Science by researchers at Harvard University and the Stockholm School of Economics. While previous studies have focused almost exclusively on punishment for promoting public cooperation, here rewards are shown to be much more successful.

The new study, which finds that rewards robustly build compliance and , could help in developing solutions for thorny problems requiring the cooperation of large numbers of people to achieve a greater good. It was conducted using a computer-based public goods game, a classic experiment for measuring collective action in a laboratory setting. The study contradicts previous research, which has stated that peer punishment is the only effective mechanism for promoting public cooperation.

Lead author David G. Rand, a postdoctoral researcher at Harvard's Program for , says the work has implications far beyond subjects' behavior in a .

"All of us engage in public goods games, on both large and small scales," Rand says. "Climate change is a huge public goods game: If each person does his or her part to conserve energy and reduce CO2 emissions, it benefits us all. On a more local level, public goods games include volunteering on school boards, helping to maintain public facilities in your community, or cleaning up after yourself and doing your share of work at the office."

"In these types of domains, where people interact repeatedly with each other to solve a group social dilemma, our work suggests that rewards result in better outcomes than punishment," Rand says. "Rewards can change individuals' behavior and encourage cooperation without the destructive negative consequences that come with punishment."

Rand and his colleagues, headed by Martin A. Nowak of Harvard's Program for Evolutionary Dynamics, examined cooperation among 192 participants in a public goods game probing the fundamental tension between the interests of an individual and a group.

Over 50 rounds of interaction, each of four participants in a group would decide how much to contribute toward a common pool that benefited all four equally. Each participant was then able -- at a cost to him or herself -- to either or punish each of the three other subjects for their contributions to the group, or lack thereof.

As in real life, Rand says, study subjects tend to resent "free riders" who fail to contribute to a group yet reap the benefits of membership in it.

"But despite this anger at free riders, rewarding good behavior is as effective as punishing bad behavior for maintaining public cooperation and leads to better outcomes for the group," Rand says. "When both options are available, reward leads to increased contributions and payoff for the group, while punishment has no effect on contributions and leads to lower payoff for the group."

Previous research has suggested that punishment can compel cooperation in anonymous two-time interactions where individuals need not worry about reputation or retaliation -- a scenario Rand, Nowak, and colleagues find unrealistic, since most of our real-life interactions are recurring, with our reputations always at stake.

"Sometimes it is argued that it is easier to punish people than to reward them," the researchers write. "We think this is not the case. Life is full of … situations where we can help others. These sorts of productive interactions are the building blocks of our society and should not be disregarded."

http://www.physorg.com/news171206724.html

Join The Newsletter

Close Me


Name:
Email: