Survey: Your thoughts on Mind Control

Take the poll and the results of will be displayed after you click "vote".

Mind Penetration: The Ancient Art of Mental Mastery

Large Image


























Click of Image for Amazon.com page.

Mind Penetration: The Ancient Art of Mental Mastery

To read the mind of your enemy, to turn his psyche to your own purpose, and to claim victory without ever landing a blow, these are the secrets of I-Hsing. Masters of I-Hsing's greatest weapon, the Mind-Fist, gain more than an advantage over their foes, they gain control of them.

Dr. Haha Lung adds to his canon of easy-to-understand, relevant martial arts instruction with this indispensable guide to dominating your enemy's mind. In his previous classics, Mind Control and Mind Manipulation, he laid the groundwork for smashing your enemy's mental defenses. In Mind Penetration, Dr. Lung teaches the skills and techniques behind this seemingly supernatural ability to bend anyone to your will.

In this comprehensive guide to I-Hsing you will:

  • Explore the origin and history of mind manipulation
  • Discover its practice in the ancient Far East and in the modern West
  • Learn how to control the minds of your enemies
  • Gain confidence and knowledge through clear descriptions and helpful illustrations
Perception and Perspective

"For the professional deceiver [magicians, spies, confidence men] the problem is not one of moral rectitude but rather of social comprehension. He or she must understand the seen-but-unnoticed features of everyday life." -Lyman & Scott, 1989:176

Contents

Introduction: "How to Be Outstanding in Your Field"....................x
PART I. WHO CAN YOU TRUST?....................1
1. Perception and Perspective....................3
2. Appreciation vs. Application....................12
PART II. EAST IS EAST ....................23
3. India: The Mother of All Mothers....................27
4. China: The Mind-Fist....................69
5. Japan: Silk and Steel....................161
PART III. ... AND WEST IS WEST....................217
6. Mind Control by the Numbers (Round Three)....................220
Conclusion....................253
Glossary....................254
Authorities....................257

How One Guy Memorized the Periodic Table of Elements

I finally managed all 117 elements in 15 minutes yesterday:

2008_04_10-periodic-table

To nail an element, you have to type its full name, not its symbol, though it accepts standard spellings in addition to the "English" variations (i.e. aluminium vs. aluminum).

My mnemonic strategies varied. Of course, none of them are useful for anything except completing this particular quiz.

You have to start with hydrogen, of course, and it's easy to stay within the order of increasing atomic number at the beginning: helium, lithium, beryllium, carbon, nitrogen, oxygen.

Fluorine is memorable, if only for its spelling -- my chemistry teacher used to say, "It's fluorine, not 'flo-urine.'" After that, it's the noble gases -- neon, argon, krypton, xenon (think headlights), and radon.

Initially, I had no idea what to do with the elements above atomic number 111, but they all have temporary names that stick to a very simple convention: unun[numerical prefix]ium, so if you can remember one (say, ununpentium), that's basically 7 elements right there (just remember that 116 is ununhexium, not ununsexium).

After that, it becomes a little hit or miss for me. The halogen group isn't bad -- we already have fluorine, so chlorine, bromine, and iodine fall in pretty easily. Although what the hell is astatine? No idea, but that kind of leads into some other odd ones, like arsenic and antimony.

Chlorine is part of salt, as is sodium, which jumps us back to the alkali metals, like potassium. Rubidium gave me problems until I looked it up and saw that it was named for its ruby-reddish properties. Then there's cesium (used in atomic clocks) and barium (used in diagnostic enemas), then francium.

Francium leads us to places elements -- germanium, polonium (which is also used to kill dissidents, as is thallium), europium. Rhodium isn't named for Rhodesia or Rhode Island, nor is Indium named for India or Indiana, but whatever. Then there's the National Labs in California -- californium, berkelium, lawrencium -- and americium.

Although we dipped into the Lanthanide series (lanthanum) and the Actinide series (actinium and protactinium), let's go back to the metals everyone knows: gold, silver, platinum, iron, tin, mercury, magnesium (and manganese), nickel, zinc, aluminum, titanium, lead (and bismuth, for some reason).

If you know bike frames, you'll know chrome-moly (chromium and molybdenum [which is not pronounced "molly-bee-denim"), then other elements used in common alloys: vanadium, scandium, tantalum, zirconium.

Niobium is used in anodized rainbow-colored body jewelry (ask me how I know this).

Tungsten is used in light bulb filaments and anti-tank rounds; palladium was used in cold fusion; osmium I know from a comic book (it was used to make denser-than-usual barbell weights for superhumans); cadmium was used in paint pigments, as well as to dampen nuclear reactions.

Speaking of, you can't forget the other radioactives -- uranium and plutonium. Then there's the various isotopes of cobalt, thorium, and strontium that pop up in all sorts of sci-fi, from Isaac Asimov to Beneath the Planet of the Apes to Judge Dredd; technetium has a root of techne; rhenium is "Rhine," so it's back to places; but then you go to ruthenium, which isn't named for Babe Ruth (but could be); while we're back to people we can go headlong back into the Actinide and Lanthanide series: curium (Marie Curie worked with radium), einsteinium, bohrium, mendelevium, nobelium, roentgenium, seaborgium (resistance is futile), meitnerium (reminded me of a guy I knew in college, Scott Mitzner), fermium, rutherfordium, gadolinium (yes, I used James Gandolfini as a mnemonic device), hassium (yes, I realize that it wasn't named for David Hasselhoff, though while we're here we might as well take care of hafnium); dubnium (which, also, is not named for Dubya); tellurium (not named for Edward Teller).

It starts to get ugly here. Neodymium (not "neodynium") is used in speakers, which is kind of related to praseodymium; cerium for the asteroid/minor planet/Roman god Ceres, leading to neptunium for the planet/god and promethium; samarium (kind of a good Samaritan); back to places in Scandanavia with ytterbium (and as we hit the Y's, think yttrium), terbium, erbium, holmium (think Stockholm); and thulium (think Ultima Thule).

So where does that leave us? Some nonstandard names: phosphorous, sulfur, silicon. Silicon is used in semiconductor chips, as is gallium. Minerals you find in vitamins: selenium, calcium. Lutetium, for the lute. Darmstadtium is technically derived from a place, though it's easier to think "darn" and go form there. And dysprosium you just have to know.

I think that covers it. Did I miss anything?



Learn the Techniques to
a Powerful Memory

Click Here

Reasonable or Rational?

People justify themselves in the most interesting ways and call it "reasonable".

"Reasonable" is an interesting term because it implies that there is a reason for their conclusion or a reason that justifies their response.

Simply based on that definition it's just as "reasonable" to get pissed off if a cop pulls you over for speeding as it is for the sun to come up in the east. One thing causes the other. That is your reason.

Rational is a completely different matter.

Rationality has no emotion to it. It is pure logic based on what you want to accomplish.

Using that pure logic you will know what to do and why you are doing. You will also have the benefit of calm. If there is no calm then you may be reasonable but you're not being rational.

Subliminal Messages Make Us Work Harder

By Roger Highfield,
Science Editor, The Telegraph

Bad news for hard pressed workers: a subliminal "pep talk" can make people work harder, even though they do not realise it.

Flashing up motivating words for an instant on a screen can make people try more, according to Prof Henk Aarts of Utrecht University, Netherlands.

The professor is using this method to study human limits, for instance to uncover the true abilities of an athlete. "I am interested in what the mind can do for us, without us knowing it."

But there are wider implications of how it is possible to prime someone to do more for what we mean by free will.

Although bosses may be tempted to try this to spur on their workers, which would be unethical, Prof Aarts says that the effect may be subtle and short lived, only occurring for a couple of minutes.

With his colleagues he shows in the journal Science that people expend more effort on a work out when a little subliminal flash of what he calls "meaningful" words such as "exertion" and "vigorous" is accompanied by the presentation of a positive word such as "good" or "nice".

The researchers tested this idea on 42 people by showing one group of people onlyPost Options positive words and later measuring their performance on a handgrip test. Two other groups had other messages.

A second group saw positive words and exertion words, but these words were not linked to each other. And they did tests on a third group, where the exertion words were linked with the positive ones.

After 50 trials of exposure to the words, they found that people who saw encouraging words such as "good" mixed in with the exertion words were more persistent and put more effort in their grips - doubling the force used - that those who saw exertion words or only positive words.

"We know from other research that people evaluate positive words automatically, and when these positive words are linked with a subliminal flash of physical exertion, their effort is motivated. They keep on squeezing, so they are more persistent."

Sponsored Link:
Create Your One Subliminal
Messages!

Mind-to-Mind Connection: How to Influence People With Your Mind

By Jim Francis
Source
: Real Mind Power Secrets

It has long been suspected that your right cerebral hemisphere, when in the alpha state, operates in a realm where time and space are of no consequence. What you think affects others... and what others think affects you!

It is rather like the invisible connection between the earth's magnetic field and every magnetic compass on earth. They are interconnected. If the earth's magnetic field were to suddenly shift then every compass in existence would swing in unison.

Likewise, if you suddenly move a magnetic compass, or any magnet for that matter, this movement will have a slight effect on the earth's entire magnetic field. Admittedly this would be so small as to be immeasurable but it would still be there.

Similarly, when you have a thought it “twitches” the entire human consciousness "thought field".

Rupert Sheldrake calls this the Morphogenetic Field. Karl Jung called it Collective Unconsciousness.

Jose Silva found a practical method of evoking and controlling this marvelous human ability at will.

The technique, which is amazingly simple, has been developed over the years but to this day more than 99% of the population are unaware of it.

In the United States it is used extensively in business to "sway" the outcome of a business proposition in favor of the person using Subjective Communication.

In personal life it has been used to resurrect a dying marriage, to name but one of its many applications.

And one of the most extraordinary applications is to use it to make people aware of your advertisement in the Yellow Pages!

Its effectiveness appears to vary between 20% and 500%. That is the results can be up to 500% better than they would have been without it.

If you consider two identical competitive businesses both vying for superior market share then the one that learns to use Subjective Communication will forge ahead. This has been tested and thoroughly proven.

Car dealers in the US who use this direct mental contact technique have reported a sharp improvement in sales. The usual comment is it brings customers out of the woodwork and actually closes more deals. US real estate agents use it also - it makes a vast difference in their commissions when used properly.

And it is a strange thing that most people are using it continually without being aware of it. Unfortunately they are also conveying mentally their fears and apprehensions. So it can work against them.

But used properly and with the correct protocol it can (and does) produce quite astounding results. Sometimes the results leave the practitioner somewhat startled. They almost seem too good to be true! Some beginners have had such amazing success that the result has literally left them "awe-struck!

If you decide to apply this magical mental technique to other areas of your life ...then things suddenly become much more interesting. You seem to be able to achieve anything you set out to and for some "strange" reason; even total strangers fall over backwards trying to help you.

Welcome to the world of direct mental influence... Subjective Communication!

In reality Subjective Communication is extremely easy and you do not have to have any experience whatsoever in alpha techniques, but it will help if you do. However there are simple ways to overcome this so that even a rank beginner can use Subjective Communication successfully on their first try! Learn more here...

This is an excerpt from "'How To Influence People." Learn how to connect to the minds of others at http://www.realmindpowersecrets.com

P.S. Check out this video...

It shows a new campaign to help connect people across the world with their minds! It's based on 10 years worth of private research which is now open to the public.

Watch it here: The Super Mind Evolution System

An Insider's Guide to Surviving a Kidnapping

From The Harold

By: Rebecca Agule

Posted: 4/10/08

Before the Monday, April 7 Program on Negotiation event even began, audience members looked at one another apprehensively. No one seemed to know quite what to expect from a lecture by Harvard Kennedy School mid-career MPA student Christopher Voss entitled "What to do in case of a hostage situation." Clearly that uncertainty did not dampen attendance, as Pound 100 swelled past capacity to standing-room only.

A retired 24-year veteran of the FBI, Voss originally brought his experience to Harvard as a member of the Program on Negotiation staff. During his career with the government, Voss was the FBI's lead international kidnapping negotiator, the National Security Council Hostage Working Group's hostage negotiation subject matter expert, and the U.S.'s hostage negotiation expert representative to the G-8. This work earned him numerous decorations, including the Attorney General's Award for Excellence in Law Enforcement and the FBI Agents Association Award for Distinguished and Exemplary Service.

Voss began his presentation, "Power Tools for Survival" by quoting the 19th century lawyer, soldier and poet, Eugene Ware, and laying out the evening's central theme - "What to do if the fates turn against you." He gave the audience a literal interpretation on his program's title, presenting an actual "how-to" guide for someone who has been kidnapped. The main "power tools" in Voss' supply are "The Power of Respect," "The Power of Calm," and "The Power of Time".

Voss broke down the stages of a kidnapping, introducing each with a sound bite from a famous film and giving each a catchy, memorable name. Such games and mnemonics play key roles not only in Voss's stage presence, but also in his list of recommendations to potential hostages.
"There are no specific rules to follow," Voss said. "Really, you need to stay mentally active." He continued, "Over 95% of hostages, up to 98%, usually survive. So then the issue becomes how to survive psychologically."

Throughout the stages of kidnapping, the hostage potentially has influence over his or her own fate and may wield this influence by choosing one of three courses of action: fight, flight, or float. Voss likened each stage to an animal; predictably, lions for fight and cheetahs for flight. When Voss then asked his audience what creature might represent floating, no one managed to guess the manatee.

Voss described the floating option as "just drifting in the current. Much of the time [floating] is going to be what you want to do."

The mixed audience, which included HLS and Kennedy School students, as well as other members of the Harvard community, laughed along with Voss as he referenced the notorious "Caddyshack" line, "Be the ball Billy, be the ball," to caution against fighting one's captors.

"Be the hostage, be the hostage," Voss said. "Physical resistance is met with increased physical abuse."

Voss cautioned against the instinct of fighting captors at any time after the initial abduction. "They expect you to fight, they are prepared to beat you into submission," he said about this first transport stage. "But they aren't going to kill you. If you fight at any other time, it's a good way to get yourself killed. You will pay dearly for it, and anyone else being held with you will pay dearly for it."

In addition to outlining the options available to a hostage, Voss led his audience through the four stages of kidnapping, represented by the phrase "At Home" - abduction, transport, housing and outcome - and he explained the best options available at each point.

As the FBI and similar agencies learn more about the methods of survival, the traditional mindset towards the preservation of honor during captivity has begun to change. Voss used the experience of Mike Durant, U.S. Army (ret.), who was taken hostage in 1993 by Somalis led by the warlord Mohamed Farrah Aidid in Mogadishu, as an illustration of such changes. To survive Durant followed closely the letter - if not the spirit - of his captors' commands.

Voss described this shift in mentality. "Durant decided it was stupid to get killed for refusing to say certain things. There was this stupid idea that you can't think, you can't respond."

"You can survive with honor," Voss continued. "It isn't cowardly to live." Describing the value of life, he then added pragmatically, "The U.S. government paid a lot of money to train these people."
Voss returned to this utilitarian view of kidnappers several times during the evening, reiterating that kidnappers care about the bottom line and that a hostage is really a commodity to be exchanged. "Kidnappers are organized people. They function very much like a business," he said.

When asked about kidnapper's attitudes towards injuring hostages, Voss replied in a very matter of fact tone, "They are like Pavlov's dog once they know they are going to get paid. We tell them that we don't accept damaged goods."

Voss clearly holds certain survivors in the highest regard, and he uses their experiences to augment and develop his own expertise. In addition to Durant, Voss outlined the accounts of Pepe Escobar, who was nabbed while leading a tour group in Ecuador; AP reporter Terry Anderson, who was held for six years in Lebanon; and Roy Hallums, a U.S. contractor held for almost a year in Iraq.

With admiration, Voss relayed the attitude that sustained Hallums through his ordeal. Describing the instance when six heavily armed men simply walked into Hallums' office, leaving him nowhere to go, Voss quoted him as saying, "I made the decision not to die at that moment."

Perhaps as much as any aspect of his own training, Escobar's story inspired Voss' talk throughout the evening. At the close of his presentation, Voss surprised the audience by revealing that Escobar was sitting in the front row and had been present for the entire evening. Voss invited him to the front to join in accepting questions.

As a survivor, Escobar offered his own advice to the room of potential hostages on how to avoid being taken in the first place. "Minimize your exposure," he said. "No one has to know who you are, or what you have."

Perhaps to reassure his audience, or perhaps to renew their faith in those who would be fighting for their release, Voss closed by saying, "Negotiators will never say no. From my end, the word 'no' will never come out of my mouth."

The Program on Negotiation sponsored this event.


© Copyright 2008 The Record



Short Or Long Term Relationship

Short Or Long Term Relationship

Is there a way to tell, just by looking a at persons face, if they are interested in a short-term sexual relationship, or a long-term relationship?

According to a Durham University-led study there is. The study took a group of both male and female participants and had them fill out a survey to see if they were looking for short or long term relationships. Pictures of the participants were then shown to observers and the observers were able to identify which participants wanted the short term or long term relationships based on the facial structures alone.

“A man’s square jaw, large nose and small eyes may be all it takes to convince a woman he’s only interested in a one-night stand…”

Man's Face

The image on the left is the computer average of a male looking for a long-term commitment. The image on the right is the male looking for a short-term sexual relationship. Women typically find the image on the left more attractive than the image on the right.

Woman Face

The image on the left is the computer average of a female looking for a long-term commitment. The image on the right is the female looking for a short-term commitment. Men typically find the image on the right more attractive than the image on the left.

The researchers say that men and women look for opposite clues when it comes to attractiveness. Men are more likely to see a “casual sex” women as more attractive, while women are more likely to see a “relationship” man as more attractive.

If you understand that something as subtle as slight differences in your facial structure can influence your attractiveness, just image the influence that discreet suggestions and covert gestures are going to have on other people…

I’d also like to point out that women are taught how to apply makeup to make their faces seem more attractive.

This is just further evidence of the unconscious mind control techniques that you are bombarded with every day. Using persuasion in your own interactions can be an invaluable tool to always having the upper hand. Until next time good luck.

Mind Control in an ideal world



mind control 101

Documentary On Cults

Instant Enlightenment: Fast, Deep and Sexy

Large Image

"Give all your wonderful experiences away to others, as gifts, keeping nothing, not even a memory for yourself. Guilt and tension result from hoarding your happy moments. Instant enlightenment is to give all your happiness away to others," writes David Deida, who offers trainings around the world on spiritual growth and sacred intimacy. In his audio courses and many books, he salutes the spiritual practice of openness — receptivity to new ideas, experiences, people, and possibilities. In a world where narrow-mindedness and exclusivity seem to be gaining ground, Deida's spiritual approach is more needed than ever.

This little book contains a playful collection of exercises and helpful aphorisms. Deida holds up love and the heart's feeling capacity as two aspects of instant enlightenment. "Nothing and nobody will ever give you anything except the opportunity to love," he advises. But every day we put up roadblocks and barriers of our own making: dividing the world into "good" and "bad," feeling guilty about the pleasures of the flesh, holding back praise of others, setting up walls that keep others out, and letting fear rule rather than love.

Deida wants us to square off with the things that we hate or don't understand, and many of the exercises in this book stretch us to do so even though we may feel uncomfortable trying them. What you resist persists. If you are constantly worried about getting sick, it will seem to you that people with colds or the flu are drawn to you, until you learn to relax with the prospect of being sick. Deida suggests that we tenderly explore our resistances, including despair. Other topics covered include sex, money, aging, parents, and opening to God.

VIDEO: Mind Control Makes A Perfect Soldier

Article taken from
http://www.javno.com/en/world/clanak.php?id=137542

The human mind has always been an object of study, and seeing how the average person uses only 10 percent of their brain, we cannot control our own consciousness. But, what if there are those who can control all the minds in the world and manipulate every individual? If this sounds like an excerpt from a sci-fi film, there are records of researches and experiments with the human mind. There are more and more mind control methods today and they are mostly used fro military purposes.

Allegedly, various mind control methods have been applied in military circles for years and the Pentagon has announced last year it will install microchips in soldier`s brains, the size or rice grains, in order to track their medical condition. Soldiers fear that these chips, which would supervise their vital signs 24 hours a day, might violate their privacy and place them under surveillance even when they are off duty.

The perfect soldier would not be aware of his actions

Reuters-.--.-Person with an installed chip would be manipulated in several ways, their behaviour can be altered in its entirety, therefore the controlled object can turn from completely calm to aggressive, their minds can be read, their dreams affected. This opens the door for new possibilities in armed conflicts, hostage and terrorist situations and new weapons can be developed which can be used to control the opponent.

What is frightening is that all of these processes are performed without the person knowing about it. Thus, a perfect cyber-soldier can be created and this type of secret technology was used, according to American non-governmental associations and testimonies of psychiatrists, in military circles of NATO membering countries since the 1980s without the public knowing about it and the available information is not abundant today either.

CIA destroyed evidence of experiments-.--.-

Dr. Gottlieb was CIA`s biochemist who headed the MK-ULTRA project, a mind control programme at the pinnacle of the Cold War. The programme ended in 1964, but was extended to another project called MK-SEARCH, a perfected version of the initial programme. Report on MK-ULTRA was made in 1994 and it contained information on experiments with the application of drugs, medicine and microwaves, but the CIA has destroyed most of the files unfortunately. Experiments were conducted without the objects` knowledge.

In 1948 Norbert Weiner published a book called “Cybernetics”, elaborating the human mind control theory which was not that developed at the time. Questions of people`s freedom and protection of privacy were raised and research was wrapped in a veil of secrecy. What little information had leaked in the media caused fear and disbelief.

Electrodes planted into babies` brains

-.--.-Such methods were allegedly used to improve human behaviour, thus in 1946 electrodes were planted into babies` brains without their parents` knowledge. Human beings who had a microchip installed in their brain at birth could be controlled until the rest of their lives. Experiments were conducted on soldiers, mental patients, prisoners and handicapped children.

Discussions on mass control plans began in secrecy several decades ago in the USA. In 1973 Swedish Minister Olaf Palome gave the first official permit to install implants to prisoners. Theoretically, when a 5 mm microchip in installed to the eye`s nerve, a detailed list of the most intimate feelings and physical senses can be made of that person and these impulses can return to the nervous system.

The person in unaware of suggestions and psychological reactionsReuters-.--.-

A healthy individual can thus receive information that causes hallucinations, night mares and various voices can be produced, suggesting actions and psychological direction. Information which the body receives from outer sources, like electromagnetic or energy waves, or which it creates through its own electric or chemical stimulatives, can be manipulated or altered, just like any information in any hardware system.

Fear of a new world order

Fear of being manipulated is spreading more and more because according to the latest predictions, a microchip can be installed to any newborn baby. This would create a new world order where human personality would absolutely become lost and we would all become children of the matrix, living in a would of illusion, without being aware of it.

The Power of Language

The Mind Control Technique Of Anchoring

Source: http://hypnosiscontrol.com/the-mind-control-technique-of-anchoring/


Anchoring is the name that NLP (neuro-linguistic programing) has given to the mind control technique of classical conditioning.

Basically you are adding bias and emotion to a situation, which then influences the person’s perception. By changing the way that a person perceives a situation, it is much easier to modify their behavior. When anchoring is used correctly, it becomes very easy to unconsciously control other people… This is one powerful technique indeed!

A Little Background To Classical Conditioning

If you’ve ever had a psychology class, you may remember Pavlov’s dog when discussing classical conditioning.

To put simply classical conditioning is when your brain pairs things together that happen at the same time.

For example the sound of opening a can of soda will probably make you also imagine a carbonated and cold drink.

Picking up the remote control will probably remind you of watching television.

Even unrelated things can be paired together in your brain.

For example, you may have had a romantic relationship in the past, and your lover always smelled like garlic. The thought of your lover brings back memories of desire and passion. Because of classical conditioning the smell of garlic may also bring you feelings of desire and passion. By itself garlic has nothing to do with desire and passion, but your brain has paired all of these things together.

Garlic Smell –> Previous Lover –> Desire and Passion

Garlic Smell –> Desire and Passion

The famous Pavlov rang a bell before feeding a dog. After the dog had been conditioned or “anchored” the dog salivated when he rang the bell.

Ring Bell –> Get Food –> Salivate

Ring Bell –> Salivate

The Significance Of Pairing Unrelated Things

Anchoring takes advantage of the learning process of pairing. To use the technique of anchoring you observe your subject in order to find out things that they have feelings about (an activity, a relationship, etc.) Once you have identified a topic that elicits a response, you can then pair a new stimulus to the topic.

For example, John really likes video games. When he talks about video games his eyes light up and he talks about video games passionately.

Video Games –> Excitement & Enthusiasm

So now during your conversation with John you are going to anchor another thing (squinting your eyes) to video games. So now every time that you mention video games you carefully squint your eyes. When John mentions video games, you also squint your eyes. With enough repetition John will eventually pair you squinting your eyes with the idea of video games.

You Squinting Eyes –> Video Games

Once John has made this pairing you will now have the ability to trigger the excitement and enthusiasm.

You Squinting Eyes –> Video Games –> Excitement & Enthusiasm

You Squinting Eyes –> Excitement & Enthusiasm

Lets pretend that you want John to like your friend Jane. So while talking to John you squint your eyes and begin describing Jane to him. Unconsciously John will feel excitement and enthusiasm and his perception of Jane will have this bias.

Now when you introduce the two, John is much more likely to have the emotions of excitement and enthusiasm for Jane. Pretty crazy huh?

The Steps to Anchoring Any Emotional Response

1. Find something a person has an emotional response about (hate, fear, love, disgust, embarrassment, etc.).

2. Attach a trigger (squinting eyes, flaring nostrils, grab your ear, etc.) to the thing by using repetition.

3. Use the trigger to elicit the emotional response.

Hope I’ve made this clear enough. Good Luck.

Join The Newsletter

Close Me


Name:
Email: